On the Issue of the Organizational Nature of the Grid Connection Agreement
https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2019-14-3-4-39-46
Abstract
Subject/topic. Technological connection agreement in the context of the theory of organizational relations in Russian civil law.
Goals/objectives. In the article, the author examines the doctrinal provisions and materials of judicial practice on the legal nature of the technological connection agreement. It is compared with the organizational contract. The author highlights common features that make it possible to attribute the technological connection agreement to organizational agreements and features that distinguish these two agreements. Separately, the nature of interaction between the parties to the technological connection agreement, due to the organizational nature of their relations, is considered.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the research consists of General methods of cognition; General scientific methods of research, including the system and logical method, as well as analysis, synthesis, analogy, formal legal, etc.
Conclusion and Relevance. Based on the analysis, the author makes conclusions about the qualification of the technological connection agreement as a property and organizational agreement that organically combines elements of organizational and property agreements. For the first time in the legal literature, the author formulated his own definition of the category of property-organizational contract that he deduced.
About the Author
M. T. Khamidullin
Federal state Autonomous educational institution of higher education «Kazan (Volga region) Federal University»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
postgraduate student of the Department of business and energy law
18 Kremlevskaya str., Kazan, 420008
References
1. Vaseva N.V. Imushchestvennye i organizacionnye dogovory // Grazhdansko-pravovoj dogovor i ego funkcii: Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchnyh trudov / Otv. red. O.A. Krasavchikov. – Sverdlovsk, 1980. – 143 s.
2. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast’ vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 №14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 29.01.1996. №5. St. 410.
3. Grazhdanskoe pravo: V 4 t. Tom 3: Obyazatel’stvennoe pravo / otv. red. prof. E.A. Suhanov. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. – 800 s.
4. Gorodov O.A. Dogovory v sfere elektroenergetiki: Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. – 235 s.
5. Eliseev I.S. Tekhnologicheskoe prisoedinenie – pro et contra // Energetika i pravo. – 2009. – №1. – s. 45-60.
6. Kirsanov K.A. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie organizacionnyh otnoshenij: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 2008. – 27 s.
7. Kirsanov K.A. Grazhdansko-pravovye organizacionnye otnosheniya (teoreticheskij aspekt) // Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. – 2003. – №2. – s. 9-13.
8. Kiryuhina E.V. Nekotorye voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya dogovora tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya k elektricheskim setyam // YUridicheskij mir. – 2009. – №6. – s. 27-33.
9. Kozlova E.B. Organizacionnye dogovory: ponyatie i klassifikaciya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2011. – №5. – s. 3-9.
10. Krasavchikov O.A. Organizacionnye grazhdansko-pravovye otnosheniya // Antologiya ural’skoj civilistiki. 1925 – 1989: Sb. st. – M.: Statut, 2001. – 430 s.
11. Matiyashchuk S.V. Sistema dogovornyh otnoshenij po elektro- i teplosnabzheniyu v usloviyah razvitiya kogeneracii : avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2012. – 54 s.
12. Morozov S.YU. Sistema transportnyh organizacionnyh dogovorov. – M.: Norma, 2011. – 352 s.
13. Morozov S.YU. Nekotorye problemy, svyazannye s opredeleniem pravovoj prirody grazhdansko-pravovyh organizacionnyh dogovorov // Rossijskaya yusticiya. – 2015. – № 7. – S. 11-14.
14. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 19.01.2018 №310-ES17-11570 po delu №A62-434/2016 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tant Plyus».
15. Osnovy cenoobrazovaniya v oblasti reguliruemyh cen (tarifov) v elektroenergetike, utverzhdennye Postanovleniem Pravitel’stva RF ot 29.12.2011 №1178 // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 23.01.2012. №4. St. 504.
16. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 25.10.2017 po delu №A67-8387/2016 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tant Plyus».
17. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 13.04.2017 po delu №A44-4085/2016 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tant Plyus».
18. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Central’nogo okruga ot 16.09.2016 po delu №A23-7165/2014 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tant Plyus».
19. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 10.07.2012 №2551/12 po delu №A56-66569/2010 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tant Plyus».
20. Pravila podklyucheniya (tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya) k sistemam teplosnabzheniya, vklyuchaya pravila nediskriminacionnogo dostupa k uslugam po podklyucheniyu (tekhnologicheskomu prisoedineniyu) k sistemam teplosnabzheniya, utverzhdennye Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 05.07.2018 №787 // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 16.07.2018. №29. St. 4432. SPS «Konsul’tant Plyus».
21. Puginskij B.I. Kommercheskoe pravo Rossii: Uchebnik. 2-e izd. – M., ZERCALO, 2006. – 352 s.
22. Svirkov S.A. Dogovornye obyazatel’stva v elektroenergetike / S.A. Svirkov. – M.: Statut, 2006. – 253 s.
23. Semenovich K.S. Dogovor tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya k elektricheskim setyam: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – SPb., 2017. – 167 s.
24. Smagin A.V. Dogovor ob osushchestvlenii tekhnologicheskogo prisoedineniya kak samostoyatel’naya sdelka v elektroenergetike: aktual’nye problemy // Energetika i pravo. – 2013. – №3. – s. 22-28.
25. Federal’nyj zakon ot 27.07.2010 №190-FZ «O teplosnabzhenii» // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 02.08.2010. №31. St. 4159.
26. Hasnutdinov A.I. Vspomogatel’nye dogovory na transporte: dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. – Irkutsk, 1995. – 317 s.
Review
For citations:
Khamidullin M.T. On the Issue of the Organizational Nature of the Grid Connection Agreement. Information and Innovations. 2019;14(3-4):38-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2019-14-3-4-39-46
Views:
284
Email this article 