Monitoring and Improvement of Performance Indicators of Science Cities
https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-4-38-46
Abstract
The article presents a statistical analysis of the activities of science cities in 2022 of implementation measures of socio-economic development strategies and compliance with the requirements for the status of “science city”. The disadvantages of the ongoing monitoring of the activities of science cities are discovered. Additional monitoring indicators that allow to conduct systematic analysis of the activities of science cities with the subsequent development of recommendations for their further development are proposed. A conclusion is made about the dynamics of the development of science cities and the need to use additional indicators for assessing the activities of science cities.
About the Author
N. M. Emelin
Scientific and Technical Institute of Inter-Industry Information(STIIII)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Emelin Nikolay M. - Honored Scientist of the RSFSR, Dr. Sci (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher
22, b.1-2, Zorge str., Moscow, 125252
References
1. VolodinaЕ.D., Gutsyniuk O.N., PoleshchukО.D., Popova E.А., Ridiger A.V. (2023) Problems of implementation of the state scientific and technical policy to support science cities and territories with a high concentration of scientific and technological potential. Information and Innovations. Т18, (3), pp.50-68.
2. Emelin N. M., Volodina E. D., Ryabov P. A. (2019) Monitoring and Evaluation of the Rating of Science Cities. Monitoring. Science and Technologies. No. 4, pp.99—103.
3. Emelin N.M., Melikhov V.O. (2016) Innovative activity of science cities as a factor of ensuring the stability of the municipal economy. Strategic stability. No. 1(74), pp. 42-48.
4. Kolesova O. (2023) Aspiration for isolation. Search. No.36 (1786), P.10.
5. Monakhov I.A. (2016) Methodology and practice of management of the development of science cities of the Russian Federation at the present stage. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Tver State University, p.203.
6. Tuyakova D. K. (2016) Improving the system of preservation and termination of the status of the science city of the Russian Federation. Economics and entrepreneurship. No. 12-4(77), pp.720-723.
7. Emelin N.M. Criteria and performance indicators for the activities of state research centers. // Izvestia IIF, 2023, No. 1 (67), pp. 97-99.
Review
For citations:
Emelin N.M. Monitoring and Improvement of Performance Indicators of Science Cities. Information and Innovations. 2023;18(4):38-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-4-38-46
Views:
326
Email this article 