Preview

Information and Innovations

Advanced search

Institutions of Social Memory and the Problems of Transition to Digital Society

https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2020-15-3-21-26

Abstract

The article discusses the problems of transformation of social memory institutions in the context of the transition to a digital society. During the transformation, multidirectional dynamics are revealed, associated with a change in the technological basis, functioning models and social functions of libraries, archives and museums. Along with the strengthening of the role of some of the institutions of social memory as platforms for communication and public dialogue, their integration into the Unified Digital Knowledge Space leads to the expansion of functionality and to the upgrading of the status of social memory institutions in digital society. At the same time, the influence of scientific libraries and centers of scientific and technical information on the processes of knowledge production, its expert evaluation, as well as reflection and control of the dynamics of the formation of digital society can increase.

About the Author

D. V. Efremenko
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences (INION RAS)
Russian Federation

Dr.sc., deputy director 

Moscow

 



References

1. Mccarthy J. In U.S., Library Visits Outpaced Trips to Movies in 2019 // Gallup. 2020. January 24. URL: https://news.gallup.com/poll/284009/ library-visits-outpaced-trips-movies-2019.aspx (accessed: 14.02.2020).

2. Kranich N. Libraries and civic engagement // Library and book trade almanac, ed. by D. Bogart, B.J. Turock. Medford, NJ: Information today, 2012. Pp. 75–96.

3. Yanitsky O. N. Sociobiotechnicheskie systemy: novyj vzglyad na vzaimodeistvie cheloveka i prirody // Socialnaya nauka I socialnaya praktika. 2016. Т. 4. N. 3, С. 5–22.

4. Efremenko D.V., Yanitsky O.N., Ermolaeva P.O. O sociobiotechnicheskikh systemah // Voprosy philosophii. 2019. N. 5, с. 138–147.

5. Latour B. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte, «L’armillaire», 1991.

6. Gandy M. Rethinking Urban Metabolism: Water, Space and the Modern City // City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2004. Vol. 8. № 3, pp. 363–379.

7. Pape U., Smirnova A. Transforming the public sphere: The case of Moscow’s city libraries // Cultural Studies. 2018. Vol. 32. № 5, pp. 772–799.

8. Antopolskii A.B. Nauchnaya informatsia i elekronnoe prostranstvo znanij — Moscow: INION RAS, 2020.

9. Kirikova M. Challenges in Enterprise and Information Systems Modeling in the Contexts of Socio Cyber Physical Systems // Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation: 15th International Workshop, EOMAS 2019, Held at CAiSE 2019, Rome, Italy, June 3–4, 2019, Selected Papers, ed. by R. Pergl, E. Babkin, R. Lock, P. Malyzhenkov, V. Merunka. Cham: Springer, 2019. Pp. 60–69.

10. Antopolskii A.B. Nauchnaya informatsia i elekronnoe prostranstvo znanij — Moscow: INION RAS, 2020.

11. Putin V. V. Poslanie Prezidenta Federalnomu Sobranju. 15.01.2020. // Oficialnyj sait Prezidenta Rossji. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/ news/62582 (accessed: 28.01.2020).

12. Bremmer I. The End of the American Order: Ian Bremmer speech at 2019 GZERO Summit. 18.11.2019. // Eurasia Group. URL: https1://www. eurasiagroup.net/live-post/end-of-americanorder-ian-bremmer-2019-gzero-summit-speech (обращение: 23.01.2010).

13. Majstrovich T.V. Rol nauchnykh elektronnykh bibliotek v rashirenii prostranstva znanij: monografia. — Moscow: INION RAN, 2020.

14. Antopolskii A.B., Bosov A.V., Savin G.I., Sotnikov A.N., Tsvetkova V.A., Kalenov N.E., Serebryakov V.A., Efremenko D.V. Prinzipy postroenja I struktura Edinogo tsifrovogo prostranstva znanij (ETPNZ) // Nauchnotechnicheskaya informatsia. Ser. 1: Organizatsia I metodika informatsionnoj raboty. 2020. N. 4, s. 9-17.

15. Efremenko D. V. Formirovanie tsifrovogo obshestva I geopoliticheskaya konkurenzia // Kontury globalnikh transformatsij: politika, ekonomika, pravo. Т. 13. 2020. N. 2, s. 25–43.

16. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. – Stanford: Stanford university press, 1991.


Review

For citations:


Efremenko D.V. Institutions of Social Memory and the Problems of Transition to Digital Society. Information and Innovations. 2020;15(3):21-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2020-15-3-21-26

Views: 429


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-2443 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2157 (Online)