Preview

Information and Innovations

Advanced search

Technological Sovereignty as a Current Energy Security Challenge. Preliminary analysis

https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443.2025.15

Abstract

The relevance of this work is determined by the importance of energy security, which consists not only in reducing dependence on fossil fuels, but also in avoiding dependence on advanced technologies. The development of artificial intelligence, which requires significant energy and technological resources, is shifting the focus of competition from energy security to technological sovereignty. The aim of this study was to identify suitable tools for analyzing abstracts text obtained from a large volume of bibliometric records. It focused on the preliminary assessment of current topics in the energy sector with the aim of effectively analyzing trends in technological sovereignty issues. Data. In this paper 10 thousand bibliometric records for the year 2024, sorted by relevance and exported from the open abstract database Sciliton the query: “energy AND technology”. Filters were applied on the “Subject” category most related to technology: Power Systems & Electric Vehicles, Energy Systems & Technologies, Electrical Energy Management, and Nuclear Technology & Instrumentation. Results. The main topic of the analyzed bibliometric data was renewable energy. Based on keywords, twelve clusters were identified, three of which — hydrogen, thermal energy storage, and greenhouse gas emissions — are of greatest interest. These clusters reflect keywords derived from both Yake! and PatternRank. The Yake! program outperforms PatternRank in terms of run time and representation of found keywords in abstract texts. The feasibility of using AnyAscii for text preprocessing is demonstrated. Conclusions. The study showed that it is necessary to expand data sources for a more comprehensive analysis of the issue under consideration, for example, using OnePetro for topics related to oil and gas, IEEE Xplore for energy systems issues, and Semantic Scholar for assessing the role of AI in the energy sector.

About the Author

B. N. Chigarev
Oil and Gas Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Boris N. Chigarev, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Senior Researcher

3, Gubkina str., 119333 Moscow



References

1. Hauser H. Technology, sovereignty and realpolitik. In: Wang H., Michie A., eds. Consensus or Conflict?. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021:233-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5391-9_21

2. Grant P. Technological sovereignty: forgotten factor in the ‘hi-tech’ razzamatazz. Prometheus. 1983;1(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028308628930

3. Kapoguzov E.A., Pakhalov A.M. Technological sovereignty: Conceptual approaches and perceptions by the Russian academic experts. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2024;3(64):244–250. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_244-250. EDN: NBZEHV

4. Gu H. Data, big tech, and the new concept of sovereignty. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI. 2024;29(4):591-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09855-1

5. Hummel P., Braun M., Tretter M., Dabrock P. Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society. 2021;8(1):2053951720982012. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012

6. Musiani F. Infrastructuring digital sovereignty: a research agenda for an infrastructurebased sociology of digital self-determination practices. Information, Communication & Society. 2022;25(6):785-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2049850

7. Van Vliet L., Herzog-Hawelka J., McDonnell C. Neo-colonialism and leaving fossil fuels underground: a discourse analysis of the potential German-Senegalese gas partnership. Energy Research & Social Science. 2025;125:104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104121

8. Wang J., Ghosh S., Olayinka O.A., Doğan B., Shah M.I., Zhong K. Achieving energy security amidst the world uncertainty in newly industrialized economies: The role of technological advancement. Energy. 2022;261:125265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125265

9. Golov R.S. Energy saving as a factor of energy security: personnel support. Scient Work Fr Econom Soc Rus. 2024;249(5):126-145. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2024-249-5-126-145

10. Prăvălie R., Bandoc G. Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications. Journal of Environmental Management. 2018;209:81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.043

11. Asif M., Solomon B., Adulugba C. Prospects of nuclear power in a sustainable energy transition. Arab J Sci Eng. 2025;50(5):3467-3477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09557-7

12. Manowska A., Boros M., Hassan M.W., Bluszcz A., Tobór-Osadnik K. A modern approach to securing critical infrastructure in energy transmission networks: integration of cryptographic mechanisms and biometric data. Electronics. 2024;13(14):2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142849

13. Ogunsuji Y.M., Amosu, O.R., Choubey D., Abikoye B.E., Kumar P., Umeorah S.C. Sourcing renewable energy components: building resilient supply chains, reducing dependence on foreign suppliers, and enhancing energy security. World J Adv Res Rev. 2024;23(2):251-262. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2297

14. Akpasi S.O., Smarte Anekwe I.M., Tetteh E.K., Amune U.O., Mustapha S.I., Kiambi S.L. Hydrogen as a clean energy carrier: advancements, challenges, and its role in a sustainable energy future. Clean Energy. 2025;9(1):52-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae112

15. Ganguly S., Bhan U. Scope of geothermal energy in Indian energy security. In: Sahu A.K., Meikap B.C., Kudapa V.K., eds. Energy Storage and Conservation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023:15-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2870-5_3

16. Govea J., Gaibor-Naranjo W., Villegas-Ch.W. Transforming cybersecurity into critical energy infrastructure: a study on the effectiveness of artificial intelligence. Systems. 2024;12(5):165. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12050165

17. Szymczak P.D. CNPC, sinopec drill ultra deep in search of energy security. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2023;75(07):20-25. https://doi.org/10.2118/0723-0020-JPT

18. Huang Y., Lin J., Wang Y., et al. Forecast of fossil fuel demand based on low carbon emissions from the perspective of energy security. Chem Technol Fuels Oils. 2023;58(6):1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-023-01490-z

19. Kashin M.A., Novikov N.L., Novikov A.N. The use of energy storage to improve controllability and security of the belarusian power system. Energy Systems Research. 2023;6(3(23)):28-35. https://doi.org/10.25729/esr.2023.03.0003

20. Yan Z., Zhang Y., Yu J. Allocative approach to multiple energy storage capacity for integrated energy systems based on security region in buildings. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024;84:110951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110951

21. Yang Z., Hao C., Shao S., Chen Z., Yang L. Appropriate technology and energy security: From the perspective of biased technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;177:121530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121530

22. Lu W., Liu Z., Huang Y., Bu Y., Li X., Cheng Q. How do authors select keywords? A preliminary study of author keyword selection behavior. Journal of Informetrics. 2020;14(4):101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101066

23. Esmat B., Yoones T. Author-assigned Keywords in Research Articles: Where Do They Come from? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL). 2013;16(2):1-19. Accessed November 8, 2025.

24. Morozov D.A., Glazkova A.V., Tyutyulnikov M.A., Iomdin B.L. Keyphrase generation for abstracts of the russian-language scientific articles. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2023;21(1):54-66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2023-21-1-54-66

25. Roy A., Ghosh S. Freedom versus standard in article keyword generation: an empirical study. Journal of Library Metadata. 2024;24(4):291-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2024.2395198

26. Ahmed U., Alexopoulos C., Piangerelli M., Polini A. BRYT: Automated keyword extraction for open datasets. Intelligent Systems with Applications. 2024;23:200421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200421

27. Glazkova A.V., Morozov D.A., Vorobeva M.S., Stupnikov A. Keyphrase generation for the Russian-language scientific texts using mT5. Model anal inf sist. 2023;30(4):418-428. https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2023-4-418-428

28. Machado D., Barbosa T., Pais S.., Martins B, Dias G. Universal mobile information retrieval. In: Stephanidis C., ed. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments. Vol 5615. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:345-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_38

29. Schopf T., Klimek S., Matthes F. Patternrank: leveraging pretrained language models and part of speech for unsupervised keyphrase extraction: In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Valletta, Malta: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications; 2022:243-248. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011546600003335

30. Campos R., Mangaravite V., Pasquali A., Jorge A., Nunes C., Jatowt A. YAKE! Keyword extraction from single documents using multiple local features. Information Sciences. 2020;509:257-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.013

31. Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

32. Campos R., Mangaravite V., Pasquali A., Jorge A.M., Nunes C., Jatowt A. A text feature based automatic keyword extraction method for single documents. In: Pasi G., Piwowarski B., Azzopardi L., Hanbury A., eds. Advances in Information Retrieval. Vol 10772. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018:684-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_63

33. Campos R., Mangaravite V., Pasquali A., Jorge A.M., Nunes C., Jatowt A.. Yake! Collectionindependent automatic keyword extractor. In: Pasi G., Piwowarski B., Azzopardi L., Hanbury A., eds. Advances in Information Retrieval. Vol 10772. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018:806-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_80

34. Nathan P. DerwenAI/pytextrank: v3.1.1 release on PyPi. March 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4637885

35. Luo M., Xue B., Niu B. A comprehensive survey for automatic text summarization: Techniques, approaches and perspectives. Neurocomputing. 2024;603:128280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128280

36. Widyassari A.P., Rustad S., Shidik G.F., et al. Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. 2022;34(4):1029-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.05.006

37. Hu R., Wu J., Lu X. Word‐combination‐based measures of phraseological diversity, sophistication, and complexity and their relationship to second language chinese proficiency and writing quality. Language Learning. 2022;72(4):1128-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12511

38. Severina Y.D., Shakirov V.A., Takaishvili L.N. Modeling the development of energy systems of remote areas in the context of the energy transition. Energy Systems Research. 2024;7(4(28)):38-48. https://doi.org/10.25729/esr.2024.04.0005

39. Demidov I.S. Methods for analyzing and increasing cyber resilience of smart energy system facilities. Energy Systems Research. 2023;6(3(23)):75-81. https://doi.org/10.25729/esr.2023.03.0007

40. Chigarev B.N. A brief analysis of topics of the IEEE conference on energy internet and energy system integration in 2017–2021. Energy Systems Research. 2023;6(3(23)):36-49. https://doi.org/10.25729/esr.2023.03.0004

41. Lundaev V., Solomon A.A., Le T., Lohrmann A., Breyer C. Review of critical materials for the energy transition, an analysis of global resources and production databases and the state of material circularity. Minerals Engineering. 2023;203:108282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108282

42. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy. 2023;52(6):104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765

43. Zhdaneev O.V., Frolov K.N. Scientific and technological priorities of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation until 2050. OIJ. 2023;(10):6-13. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2023-10-6-13

44. Afanasyev V.Ya., Suslov D.A., Chuev S.V. Soviet experience in the development of economic and industrial potential under sanctions. OIJ. 2022;(12):156-160. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2022-12-156-160


Review

For citations:


Chigarev B.N. Technological Sovereignty as a Current Energy Security Challenge. Preliminary analysis. Information and Innovations. 2025;20(3):25-58. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443.2025.15

Views: 215

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-2443 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2157 (Online)