Altmetrics' rank among quantitative methods of evaluation of scientific work
https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-1-8-21
Abstract
Altmetrics was developed in 2010 and have attracted high interest of publishers, researchers, and generators of information databases. Altmetrics quickly obtained high popularity and have become one of the additional assessment tools for evaluation of scientific work. Currently, they are represented on the websites of large publishing houses, bibliometric databases, as well as special altmetrics resourses. We observed the most frequently used altmetrics and tried to detect their rank among other quantitative approaches to assessment of scientific work.
About the Authors
Vadim N. Gureyev
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics; State Public Scientific Technological Library
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay A. Mazov
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics; State Public Scientific Technological Library
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Larsen P. O., von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index // Scientometrics. - 2010. - V. 84, № 3. - P. 575-603
2. Tenopir C., Mays R., Wu L. Journal article growth and reading patterns // New Review of Information Networking. - 2011. - V. 16, № 1. - P. 4-22
3. Priem J., Groth P., Taraborelli D. The Altmetrics Collection // Plos One. - 2012. - V. 7, № 11. - P. 2
4. Priem J., Taraborelli D., Groth P., Neylon C. Altmetrics: a Manifesto. - 2010. - URL: http:// altmetrics.org/manifesto
5. Библиометрия, вебметрики, библиотечная статистика: Учебное пособие. / Земсков А.И. - Москва: ГПНТБ России, 2016. - 136 p.
6. Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. / Tenopir C., King D. W. - Washington: Special Libraries Association, 2000. - 488 p.
7. Liu C.L., Xu Y.Q., Wu H., Chen S.S., Guo J.J. Correlation and Interaction Visualization of Altmetric Indicators Extracted From Scholarly Social Network Activities: Dimensions and Structure // Journal of Medical Internet Research. - 2013. - V. 15, № 11. - P. 17
8. Мазов Н.А., Гуреев В.Н. Альтернативные подходы к оценке научных результатов // Вестник Российской академии наук. - 2015. - V. 85, № 2. - P. 115-122
9. Alternative metrics // Nature Materials. - 2012. - V. 11, № 11. - P. 907
10. Valenzuela M., Ha V., Etzioni O. Identifying meaningful citations // Book Identifying meaningful citations / Editor. - Austin, United States: AI Access Foundation, 2015. - C. 21-26
11. Peroni S., Shotton D. FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations // Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. - 2012. - V. 17. - P. 33-43
12. Neylon C., Wu S. Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact // Plos Biology. - 2009. - V. 7, № 11. - P. 6
13. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: Putting science into the assessment of research. American Society for Cell Biology, 2013. - 10 p.
14. Plume A. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) - Elsevier's view. - 2013. - URL: http://www.elsevier. com/connect/san-francisco-declaration-on-re-search-assessment-dora-elseviers-view (дата обращения: 14.09.2014)
Review
For citations:
Gureyev V.N., Mazov N.A. Altmetrics' rank among quantitative methods of evaluation of scientific work. Information and Innovations. 2018;13(1):18-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-1-8-21
Views:
308
Email this article 