Improving approaches to assessing the performance of science cities
https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443.2025.12
Abstract
Relevance. Low variability in the performance indicators of science cities requires adjustments to their threshold values. This article aims to improve approaches to assessing the performance of science cities, ensuring both the maintenance of a high level of scientific and technological development and their further development. Materials and Methods. Scientometric and statistical methods for studying socio-economic systems were used. Results. An analysis of the scientific and technological development of science cities and the fulfillment of requirements for their research and production complexes was conducted. Directions for adjusting the indicator values are proposed, including a median approach to changing the threshold values of indicators. Conclusions. The results of the study can be used when amending regulatory legal acts on assigning science city status to municipalities.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The work was completed under state contract No. 075001U94062505 for 2025 and the 2026–2027 planning period.
About the Author
N. M. Emelin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Scientific and Technical Institute of Intersectoral Information (NTIMI)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Emelin, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of the RSFSR, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher
22, building 1, 2, Sorge st., Moscow, 125252
References
1. Volodina E.D., Gutsyniuk O.N., Poleshchuk O.D., Popova E.A., Ridiger A.V. Problems of Implementation of the State Scientific and Technical Policy to Support Science Cities and Territories with a High Concentration of Scientific and Technological Potential. Information and Innovations. 2023;18(3):50–68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-3-50-68
2. Kalinin V.V. Features of the Science City of the Russian Federation as Distinguishing Features of the Territory with High Scientific and Technical Potential. Advances in Law Studies. 2022;4:61–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2022-10-4-61-65
3. Emelin N.M. Monitoring and Improvement of the Performance Indicators of Science Cities. Information and Innovations. 2023.18(4):38–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-4-38-46.
4. Ryashin M.P. The current state and prospects of the development of science cities in the territory of the Russian Federation. HOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Right. 2023;48(2):341–351. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-2-341-351
5. Vilensky A.V. Science cities as preferential territories of Russia. Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2024;14(1–1):226–235. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2024.53.10.054
6. Emelin N.M. Approach to the Analysis of the Activities of Scientific and Production Complexes of Science Cities. Izvestiya of the Institute of Physics. 2024;3(73):103–106. (In Russ.).
7. Zhukova A.P. Problems of the Development of Science Cities in the Russian Federation. Scientific Research and Development. Economics. 2024;12(6):24–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-627X-2024-12-6-24-28
8. Mityakova E.V., Mityakova O.I. Comprehensive Assessment of the Dynamics of Russia’s Science Cities Development. Innovative Development of the Economy. 2022;5(71):43–51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51832/222379842022543
9. Medvedev V.V. Identification of Imbalances in the System of Socio-Economic and Scientific-Technological Development of Regions and Municipalities Based on Comparing Their Ratings. Global Scientific Potential. 2020;9:89–95. (In Russ.).
10. Tuzkova D.K. Prospects for the Development of the Innovative Potential of Science Cities. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2024;12–1:131–135. (In Russ.).
11. De Groot E.A., Segers R., Prins D. Disentangling the enigma of multi-structured economic cycles – A new appearance of the golden ratio. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;169:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120793.
12. Sadykov A.I. Methodology for Assessing the Balanced Socioeconomic Development of a Region. Economic Sciences. 2022;11(216):153–158. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14451/1.216.153
13. Gevraseva A.P. Assessment of the Balanced Regional Economy Based on the Golden Ratio Principle. Proceedings of BSTU. Series 5. Economics and Management. 2021;2(250):76–82. (In Russ.).
14. Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A. Systemic Balancing of the Russian Economy. Regional Aspect. Economy of the Region. 2019;15(2):309–323. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-2-1
15. Emelin N.M., Kartunin D.N. Analysis of the Results and Evaluation of the Activities of State Research Centers of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya of the Institute of Physics. 2025;3(77):77–80. (In Russ.).
16. Kartunin D.N. Scientific and Methodological Support for Monitoring the Activities of State Research Centers in the Russian Federation. Intellectual Property. Industrial Property. 2024;3:41–47. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Emelin N.M. Improving approaches to assessing the performance of science cities. Information and Innovations. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443.2025.12
Views:
28
Email this article 