Technology transfer: A Comparison Between Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus
https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-53-69
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
López-Rubio PedroРоссия
Norat Roig-Tierno
Россия
Mas-Verdú Francisco
Россия
Список литературы
1. Faberberg J. & Verspagen B. (2009). Innovation studies: the emerging structure of a new scientic eld. Research Policy, 38, 218-233.
2. Cancino C., Merigó J. M. & Palacios-Marqués D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of innovation research. CID Working Papers, 2015-02, University of Chile, Santiago, 2015.
3. Cajaiba-Santana G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the eld forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
4. Smith K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 1, 73-102.
5. Metcalfe, S. (2004). Policy for Innovation. ESRC Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition. University of Manchester, Manchester.
6. Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Lindmark S. & Rickne A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407-429.
7. Fernández de Lucio I. F., Mas-Verdú F. & Tortosa E. (2010). Regional innovation policies: the persistence of the linear model in Spain. The Service Industries Journal,30(5), 749-762.
8. Etzkowitz H. & Leydesdor L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
9. Chesbrough H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Proting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
10. Lundvall B. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.
11. Roessner J. D. (2000). Technology transfer. In: Hill C. Ed., Science and Technology Policy in the US, A Time of Change. Longman, London.
12. Bozeman B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655.
13. Manseld E. (1982). Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy. W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
14. Steenhuis H.J. & de Boer S.J. (2002). Dierentiating between types of technology transfer: the Technology Building. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 1, (1-2), 187-200.
15. Zuniga P., & Correa P. (2013). Technology Transfer from Public Research Organizations: Concepts, Markets, and Institutional Failures. The Innovation Policy Platform. World Bank.
16. UN (2001). Transfer of Technology. UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
17. Grosse, R. (1996). International Technology Transfer in Services. Journal of International Business Studies, 781-800.
18. Krugman P. (1979). A Model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. The Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253-266.
19. Pritchard A. (1969). Statistical Bibliographic or Bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
20. Nalimov V.V. & Mulchenko Z.M. (1969). Naukometriya. Izuchenie Razvitiya Nauki kak Informatsionnogo Protsessa. [Scientometrics. Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process], Nauka, Moscow, (English translation: 1971. Washington, D.C.: Foreing Technology Division. U.S. Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. (NTIS Report No.AD735-634).
21. Nacke O. (1979). Informetrie: Ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin. Nachrichten für Dokumentation, 20, 212-226.
22. Broadus R.N. (1987). Toward a denition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373-379.
23. Sengupta I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Scientometrics and Librametrics: An Overview. Libri, 42(2), 75-98.
24. Hood W. W. & Wilson C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics. Scientometrics 52(2), 291-314.
25. He X.R., Wu Y.Y., Yu D. & Merigó J.M. (2017). Exploring the ordered weighted averaging operator knowledge domain: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32, 1151-1166.
26. Hirsch J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientic research output. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572.
27. Merigó, J.M., Gil-Lafuente A. M., & Yager R. R. (2015). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420-433.
28. Small H. (1999). Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
29. Noyons E.C.M., Moed H.F., & Van Raan A.F.J. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), 591-604.
30. Kessler M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientic papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
31. Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientic literature: a new measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
32. Marshakova I. (1973). System of Document Connections Based on References. Scientic and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6(2), 3-8.
33. Courtial J. P. (1994). A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31(3), 251-260.
34. Van Eck N. J., & Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
35. Cobo M. J., López-Herrera A. G., Herrera-Viedma E., & Herrera F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
36. Mongeon P. & Paul-Hus A. (2016). The journal coverage
37. Cancino C., Merigó J. M., & Palacios-Marqués D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of innovation research. CID Working Papers, 2015-02, University of Chile, Santiago, 2015
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , . Информация и инновации. 2018;13(2):53-69. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-53-69
For citation:
Pedro L., Roig-Tierno N., Francisco M. Technology transfer: A Comparison Between Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Information and Innovations. 2018;13(2):53-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-53-69